Commit 0a6fb502 authored by Jingwen Chen's avatar Jingwen Chen Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/amd/amdgpu: fix refcount leak

[Why]
the gem object rfb->base.obj[0] is get according to num_planes
in amdgpufb_create, but is not put according to num_planes

[How]
put rfb->base.obj[0] in amdgpu_fbdev_destroy according to num_planes
Signed-off-by: default avatarJingwen Chen <Jingwen.Chen2@amd.com>
Acked-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 4aa7e6e0
......@@ -288,10 +288,13 @@ static int amdgpufb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
static int amdgpu_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct amdgpu_fbdev *rfbdev)
{
struct amdgpu_framebuffer *rfb = &rfbdev->rfb;
int i;
drm_fb_helper_unregister_fbi(&rfbdev->helper);
if (rfb->base.obj[0]) {
for (i = 0; i < rfb->base.format->num_planes; i++)
drm_gem_object_put(rfb->base.obj[0]);
amdgpufb_destroy_pinned_object(rfb->base.obj[0]);
rfb->base.obj[0] = NULL;
drm_framebuffer_unregister_private(&rfb->base);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment