Commit 0a7416f9 authored by Dmitry Osipenko's avatar Dmitry Osipenko Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: core: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in regulator_unlock_recursive()

The recent commit 7d819664 ("regulator: Remove pointer table
overallocation") changed the size of coupled_rdevs and now KASAN is able
to detect slab-out-of-bounds problem in regulator_unlock_recursive(),
which is a legit problem caused by a typo in the code. The recursive
unlock function uses n_coupled value of a parent regulator for unlocking
supply regulator, while supply's n_coupled should be used. In practice
problem may only affect platforms that use coupled regulators.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0+
Fixes: f8702f9e ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831204335.19489-1-digetx@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent 3bec5b6a
......@@ -236,8 +236,8 @@ static bool regulator_supply_is_couple(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
static void regulator_unlock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
unsigned int n_coupled)
{
struct regulator_dev *c_rdev;
int i;
struct regulator_dev *c_rdev, *supply_rdev;
int i, supply_n_coupled;
for (i = n_coupled; i > 0; i--) {
c_rdev = rdev->coupling_desc.coupled_rdevs[i - 1];
......@@ -245,10 +245,13 @@ static void regulator_unlock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (!c_rdev)
continue;
if (c_rdev->supply && !regulator_supply_is_couple(c_rdev))
regulator_unlock_recursive(
c_rdev->supply->rdev,
c_rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled);
if (c_rdev->supply && !regulator_supply_is_couple(c_rdev)) {
supply_rdev = c_rdev->supply->rdev;
supply_n_coupled = supply_rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled;
regulator_unlock_recursive(supply_rdev,
supply_n_coupled);
}
regulator_unlock(c_rdev);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment