Commit 0dce49ef authored by Gregory CLEMENT's avatar Gregory CLEMENT Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: Remove wrong spinlock usage

A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a
possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1]

Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a
critical section protected by spinlock.

However this spinlock is only used in atmel_ssc_shutdown() and
atmel_ssc_startup() functions. After further analysis, it occurred that
the call to these function are already protected by mutex used on the
calling functions.

Then we can remove the spinlock which will fix this bug as a side
effect. Thanks to this patch the following message disappears:

"BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/mutex.c:909"

[1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg71286.htmlReviewed-by: default avatarAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190918100344.23629-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent a0a4bf57
......@@ -116,19 +116,16 @@ static struct atmel_pcm_dma_params ssc_dma_params[NUM_SSC_DEVICES][2] = {
static struct atmel_ssc_info ssc_info[NUM_SSC_DEVICES] = {
{
.name = "ssc0",
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[0].lock),
.dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED,
.initialized = 0,
},
{
.name = "ssc1",
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[1].lock),
.dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED,
.initialized = 0,
},
{
.name = "ssc2",
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[2].lock),
.dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED,
.initialized = 0,
},
......@@ -317,13 +314,10 @@ static int atmel_ssc_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
snd_soc_dai_set_dma_data(dai, substream, dma_params);
spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
if (ssc_p->dir_mask & dir_mask) {
spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
if (ssc_p->dir_mask & dir_mask)
return -EBUSY;
}
ssc_p->dir_mask |= dir_mask;
spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
return 0;
}
......@@ -355,7 +349,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
dir_mask = 1 << dir;
spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
ssc_p->dir_mask &= ~dir_mask;
if (!ssc_p->dir_mask) {
if (ssc_p->initialized) {
......@@ -369,7 +362,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
ssc_p->cmr_div = ssc_p->tcmr_period = ssc_p->rcmr_period = 0;
ssc_p->forced_divider = 0;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
/* Shutdown the SSC clock. */
pr_debug("atmel_ssc_dai: Stopping clock\n");
......
......@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct atmel_ssc_state {
struct atmel_ssc_info {
char *name;
struct ssc_device *ssc;
spinlock_t lock; /* lock for dir_mask */
unsigned short dir_mask; /* 0=unused, 1=playback, 2=capture */
unsigned short initialized; /* true if SSC has been initialized */
unsigned short daifmt;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment