Commit 0f0a0a60 authored by Benjamin Gray's avatar Benjamin Gray Committed by Michael Ellerman

cxl: Use radix__flush_all_mm instead of generic flush_all_mm

The generic implementation of this function isn't really generic (Hash
is not implemented). Unfortunately, the runtime warnings cannot be
replaced with BUILD_BUG's, so it seems safer not to provide a stub in
the first place.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109045112.187069-6-bgray@linux.ibm.com
parent baf1ed24
......@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static inline void mm_context_remove_copro(struct mm_struct *mm)
* nMMU and/or PSL need to be cleaned up.
*
* Both the 'copros' and 'active_cpus' counts are looked at in
* flush_all_mm() to determine the scope (local/global) of the
* TLBIs, so we need to flush first before decrementing
* radix__flush_all_mm() to determine the scope (local/global)
* of the TLBIs, so we need to flush first before decrementing
* 'copros'. If this API is used by several callers for the
* same context, it can lead to over-flushing. It's hopefully
* not common enough to be a problem.
......@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static inline void mm_context_remove_copro(struct mm_struct *mm)
* in-between.
*/
if (radix_enabled()) {
flush_all_mm(mm);
radix__flush_all_mm(mm);
c = atomic_dec_if_positive(&mm->context.copros);
/* Detect imbalance between add and remove */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment