drm/i915: Manipulate DBuf slices properly
Start manipulating DBuf slices as a mask,
but not as a total number, as current approach
doesn't give us full control on all combinations
of slices, which we might need(like enabling S2
only can't enabled by setting enabled_slices=1).
Removed wrong code from intel_get_ddb_size as
it doesn't match to BSpec. For now still just
use DBuf slice until proper algorithm is implemented.
Other minor code refactoring to get prepared
for major DBuf assignment changes landed:
- As now enabled slices contain a mask
we still need some value which should
reflect how much DBuf slices are supported
by the platform, now device info contains
num_supported_dbuf_slices.
- Removed unneeded assertion as we are now
manipulating slices in a more proper way.
v2: Start using enabled_slices in dev_priv
v3: "enabled_slices" is now "enabled_dbuf_slices_mask",
as this now sits in dev_priv independently.
v4: - Fixed debug print formatting to hex(Matt Roper)
- Optimized dbuf slice updates to be used only
if slice union is different from current conf(Matt Roper)
- Fixed some functions to be static(Matt Roper)
- Created a parameterized version for DBUF_CTL to
simplify DBuf programming cycle(Matt Roper)
- Removed unrequred field from GEN10_FEATURES(Matt Roper)
v5: - Removed redundant programming dbuf slices helper(Ville Syrjälä)
- Started to use parameterized loop for hw readout to get slices
(Ville Syrjälä)
- Added back assertion checking amount of DBUF slices enabled
after DC states 5/6 transition, also added new assertion
as starting from ICL DMC seems to restore the last DBuf
power state set, rather than power up all dbuf slices
as assertion was previously expecting(Ville Syrjälä)
v6: - Now using enum for DBuf slices in this patch (Ville Syrjälä)
- Removed gen11_assert_dbuf_enabled and put gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled
back, as we really need to have a single unified assert here
however currently enabling always slice 1 is enforced by BSpec,
so we will have to OR enabled slices mask with 1 in order
to be consistent with BSpec, that way we can unify that
assertion and against the actual state from the driver, but
not some hardcoded value.(concluded with Ville)
- Remove parameterized DBUF_CTL version, to extract it to another
patch.(Ville Syrjälä)
v7:
- Removed unneeded hardcoded return value for older gens from
intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask - this now is handled in a
unified manner since device info anyway returns max dbuf slices
as 1 for older platforms(Matthew Roper)
- Now using INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->num_supported_dbuf_slices instead
of intel_dbuf_max_slices function as it is trivial(Matthew Roper)
v8: - Fixed icl_dbuf_disable to disable all dbufs still(Ville Syrjälä)
v9: - Renamed _DBUF_CTL_S to DBUF_CTL_S(Ville Syrjälä)
- Now using power_domain mutex to protect from race condition, which
can occur because intel_dbuf_slices_update might be running in
parallel to gen9_dc_off_power_well_enable being called from
intel_dp_detect for instance, which causes assertion triggered by
race condition, as gen9_assert_dbuf_enabled might preempt this
when registers were already updated, while dev_priv was not.
Reviewed-by: 
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: 
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: 
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200202230630.8975-6-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment