Skip to content

L
linux
Commit 107af8ec authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann
Browse files
Options

Merge branch 'bpf-fix-null-arg-semantics' 

Gianluca Borello says:

====================
This set includes some fixes in semantics and usability issues that emerged
recently, and would be good to have them in net before the next release.

In particular, ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO semantics was recently changed in
commit 9fd29c08 ("bpf: improve verifier ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO
semantics") with the goal of letting the compiler generate simpler code
that the verifier can more easily accept.

To handle this change in semantics, a few checks in some helpers were
added, like in commit 9c019e2b ("bpf: change helper bpf_probe_read arg2
type to ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO"), and those checks are less than ideal
because once they make it into a released kernel bpf programs can start
relying on them, preventing the possibility of being removed later on.

This patch tries to fix the issue by introducing a new argument type
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL that can be used for helpers that can receive a
<NULL, 0> tuple. By doing so, we can fix the semantics of the other helpers
that don't need <NULL, 0> and can just handle <!NULL, 0>, allowing the code
to get rid of those checks.
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
parents f1a8b8e3 a60dd35d
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 116 additions and 18 deletions
include/linux/bpf.h
View file @ 107af8ec
......@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
* functions that access data on eBPF program stack
*/
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, /* pointer to valid memory (stack, packet, map value) */
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL, /* pointer to valid memory or NULL */
ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM, /* pointer to memory does not need to be initialized,
* helper function must fill all bytes or clear
* them in error case.
......
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View file @ 107af8ec
......@@ -1384,13 +1384,15 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
if (type != expected_type)
goto err_type;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM ||
arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL ||
arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
/* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be
* passed in as argument, it's a SCALAR_VALUE type. Final test
* happens during stack boundary checking.
*/
if (register_is_null(*reg))
if (register_is_null(*reg) &&
arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)
/* final test in check_stack_boundary() */;
else if (!type_is_pkt_pointer(type) &&
type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE &&
......
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
View file @ 107af8ec
......@@ -78,16 +78,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_call_bpf);
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read, void *, dst, u32, size, const void *, unsafe_ptr)
{
int ret = 0;
if (unlikely(size == 0))
goto out;
int ret;
ret = probe_kernel_read(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
memset(dst, 0, size);
out:
return ret;
}
......@@ -407,7 +403,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto = {
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
.arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
.arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
.arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, bpf_pt_regs);
......@@ -498,7 +494,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_str_proto = {
.gpl_only = true,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
......@@ -609,7 +605,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto_tp = {
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
.arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
.arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
.arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
};
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_tp, void *, tp_buff, struct bpf_map *, map,
......
net/core/filter.c
View file @ 107af8ec
......@@ -1646,9 +1646,9 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_csum_diff_proto = {
.gpl_only = false,
.pkt_access = true,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL,
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
.arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
.arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL,
.arg4_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
.arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
......
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
View file @ 107af8ec
......@@ -5631,7 +5631,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on NULL",
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on NULL (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
......@@ -5645,7 +5645,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size > 0 not allowed on NULL",
"helper access to variable memory: size > 0 not allowed on NULL (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
......@@ -5663,7 +5663,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer",
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
......@@ -5680,7 +5680,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer",
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
......@@ -5702,7 +5702,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer",
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
......@@ -5727,7 +5727,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer",
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
......@@ -5750,7 +5750,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL packet pointer",
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL packet pointer (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
......@@ -5771,6 +5771,105 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size > 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 4),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 5),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: 8 bytes leak",
.insns = {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7