Commit 1086af67 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915/selftests: Run the perf MI_BB tests on gen4/5

Now that we know the ring timestamp frequency on gen4/5 we
can run the perf tests that depend on sampling the timestamp.

On g4x/ilk we must read the udw of the 64bit timestamp
register. Details in {g4x,gen5)_read_clock_frequency().

When executing the read via the CS i965 doesn't seem to need
the double read trick that CPU mmio reads need.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221031135703.14670-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
parent 38530a37
......@@ -39,6 +39,16 @@ static int perf_end(struct intel_gt *gt)
return igt_flush_test(gt->i915);
}
static i915_reg_t timestamp_reg(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 5 || IS_G4X(i915))
return RING_TIMESTAMP_UDW(engine->mmio_base);
else
return RING_TIMESTAMP(engine->mmio_base);
}
static int write_timestamp(struct i915_request *rq, int slot)
{
struct intel_timeline *tl =
......@@ -55,7 +65,7 @@ static int write_timestamp(struct i915_request *rq, int slot)
if (GRAPHICS_VER(rq->engine->i915) >= 8)
cmd++;
*cs++ = cmd;
*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_TIMESTAMP(rq->engine->mmio_base));
*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(timestamp_reg(rq->engine));
*cs++ = tl->hwsp_offset + slot * sizeof(u32);
*cs++ = 0;
......@@ -125,7 +135,7 @@ static int perf_mi_bb_start(void *arg)
enum intel_engine_id id;
int err = 0;
if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) < 6) /* for per-engine CS_TIMESTAMP */
if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) < 4) /* Any CS_TIMESTAMP? */
return 0;
perf_begin(gt);
......@@ -252,7 +262,7 @@ static int perf_mi_noop(void *arg)
enum intel_engine_id id;
int err = 0;
if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) < 6) /* for per-engine CS_TIMESTAMP */
if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) < 4) /* Any CS_TIMESTAMP? */
return 0;
perf_begin(gt);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment