KVM: Don't redo ktime_get() when calculating halt-polling stop/deadline
Calculate the halt-polling "stop" time using "start" instead of redoing ktime_get(). In practice, the numbers involved are in the noise (e.g., in the happy case where hardware correctly predicts do_halt_poll and there are no interrupts, "start" is probably only a few cycles old) and either approach is perfectly ok. But it's more precise to count any extra latency toward the halt-polling time. Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20211009021236.4122790-17-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment