Commit 10d274e8 authored by Alexei Starovoitov's avatar Alexei Starovoitov Committed by Daniel Borkmann

bpf: introduce verifier internal test flag

Introduce BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to stress test parentage chain
and state pruning.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
parent 0bb52b0d
...@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env { ...@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
int stack_size; /* number of states to be processed */ int stack_size; /* number of states to be processed */
bool strict_alignment; /* perform strict pointer alignment checks */ bool strict_alignment; /* perform strict pointer alignment checks */
bool test_state_freq; /* test verifier with different pruning frequency */
struct bpf_verifier_state *cur_state; /* current verifier state */ struct bpf_verifier_state *cur_state; /* current verifier state */
struct bpf_verifier_state_list **explored_states; /* search pruning optimization */ struct bpf_verifier_state_list **explored_states; /* search pruning optimization */
struct bpf_verifier_state_list *free_list; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *free_list;
......
...@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ enum bpf_attach_type { ...@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
*/ */
#define BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 (1U << 2) #define BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 (1U << 2)
/* The verifier internal test flag. Behavior is undefined */
#define BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ (1U << 3)
/* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have /* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have
* two extensions: * two extensions:
* *
......
...@@ -1629,6 +1629,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) ...@@ -1629,6 +1629,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
if (attr->prog_flags & ~(BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT | if (attr->prog_flags & ~(BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT |
BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT | BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT |
BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ |
BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32)) BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32))
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
......
...@@ -7222,7 +7222,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) ...@@ -7222,7 +7222,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl, **pprev; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl, **pprev;
struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state, *new; struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state, *new;
int i, j, err, states_cnt = 0; int i, j, err, states_cnt = 0;
bool add_new_state = false; bool add_new_state = env->test_state_freq ? true : false;
cur->last_insn_idx = env->prev_insn_idx; cur->last_insn_idx = env->prev_insn_idx;
if (!env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].prune_point) if (!env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].prune_point)
...@@ -9262,6 +9262,9 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, ...@@ -9262,6 +9262,9 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
env->allow_ptr_leaks = is_priv; env->allow_ptr_leaks = is_priv;
if (is_priv)
env->test_state_freq = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ;
ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env); ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env);
if (ret < 0) if (ret < 0)
goto skip_full_check; goto skip_full_check;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment