net, sysctl: Fix compiler warning when only cBPF is present
proc_dointvec_minmax_bpf_restricted() has been firstly introduced in commit 2e4a3098 ("bpf: restrict access to core bpf sysctls") under CONFIG_HAVE_EBPF_JIT. Then, this ifdef has been removed in ede95a63 ("bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv allocations"), because a new sysctl, bpf_jit_limit, made use of it. Finally, this parameter has become long instead of integer with fdadd049 ("bpf: fix bpf_jit_limit knob for PAGE_SIZE >= 64K") and thus, a new proc_dolongvec_minmax_bpf_restricted() has been added. With this last change, we got back to that proc_dointvec_minmax_bpf_restricted() is used only under CONFIG_HAVE_EBPF_JIT, but the corresponding ifdef has not been brought back. So, in configurations like CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y && CONFIG_HAVE_EBPF_JIT=n since v4.20 we have: CC net/core/sysctl_net_core.o net/core/sysctl_net_core.c:292:1: warning: ‘proc_dointvec_minmax_bpf_restricted’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 292 | proc_dointvec_minmax_bpf_restricted(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppress this by guarding it with CONFIG_HAVE_EBPF_JIT again. Fixes: fdadd049 ("bpf: fix bpf_jit_limit knob for PAGE_SIZE >= 64K") Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@dlink.ru> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191218091821.7080-1-alobakin@dlink.ru
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment