Commit 162a688e authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/amd/idle, clockevents: Use explicit broadcast control function

Replace the clockevents_notify() call with an explicit function call.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528188.S1pjqkSL1P@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 592a438f
......@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <linux/clockchips.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/user-return-notifier.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
......@@ -377,11 +377,8 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, amd_e400_c1e_mask)) {
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, amd_e400_c1e_mask);
/*
* Force broadcast so ACPI can not interfere.
*/
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_FORCE,
&cpu);
/* Force broadcast so ACPI can not interfere. */
tick_broadcast_force();
pr_info("Switch to broadcast mode on CPU%d\n", cpu);
}
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &cpu);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment