Commit 163cf548 authored by Alexey Dobriyan's avatar Alexey Dobriyan Committed by Linus Torvalds

fs/proc/internal.h: rearrange struct proc_dir_entry

struct proc_dir_entry became bit messy over years:

* move 16-bit ->mode_t before namelen to get rid of padding
* make ->in_use first field: it seems to be most used resulting in
  smaller code on x86_64 (defconfig):

	add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 7/13 up/down: 24/-67 (-43)
	Function                                     old     new   delta
	proc_readdir_de                              451     455      +4
	proc_get_inode                               282     286      +4
	pde_put                                       65      69      +4
	remove_proc_subtree                          294     297      +3
	remove_proc_entry                            297     300      +3
	proc_register                                295     298      +3
	proc_notify_change                            94      97      +3
	unuse_pde                                     27      26      -1
	proc_reg_write                                89      85      -4
	proc_reg_unlocked_ioctl                       85      81      -4
	proc_reg_read                                 89      85      -4
	proc_reg_llseek                               87      83      -4
	proc_reg_get_unmapped_area                   123     119      -4
	proc_entry_rundown                           139     135      -4
	proc_reg_poll                                 91      85      -6
	proc_reg_mmap                                 79      73      -6
	proc_get_link                                 55      49      -6
	proc_reg_release                             108     101      -7
	proc_reg_open                                298     291      -7
	close_pdeo                                   228     218     -10

* move writeable fields together to a first cacheline (on x86_64),
  those include
	* ->in_use: reference count, taken every open/read/write/close etc
	* ->count: reference count, taken at readdir on every entry
	* ->pde_openers: tracks (nearly) every open, dirtied
	* ->pde_unload_lock: spinlock protecting ->pde_openers
	* ->proc_iops, ->proc_fops, ->data: writeonce fields,
	  used right together with previous group.

* other rarely written fields go into 1st/2nd and 2nd/3rd cacheline on
  32-bit and 64-bit respectively.

Additionally on 32-bit, ->subdir, ->subdir_node, ->namelen, ->name go
fully into 2nd cacheline, separated from writeable fields.  They are all
used during lookup.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171220215914.GA7877@avx2Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent d0290bc2
......@@ -31,24 +31,27 @@ struct mempolicy;
* subdir_node is used to build the rb tree "subdir" of the parent.
*/
struct proc_dir_entry {
/*
* number of callers into module in progress;
* negative -> it's going away RSN
*/
atomic_t in_use;
atomic_t count; /* use count */
struct list_head pde_openers; /* who did ->open, but not ->release */
spinlock_t pde_unload_lock; /* proc_fops checks and pde_users bumps */
struct completion *pde_unload_completion;
const struct inode_operations *proc_iops;
const struct file_operations *proc_fops;
void *data;
unsigned int low_ino;
umode_t mode;
nlink_t nlink;
kuid_t uid;
kgid_t gid;
loff_t size;
const struct inode_operations *proc_iops;
const struct file_operations *proc_fops;
struct proc_dir_entry *parent;
struct rb_root_cached subdir;
struct rb_node subdir_node;
void *data;
atomic_t count; /* use count */
atomic_t in_use; /* number of callers into module in progress; */
/* negative -> it's going away RSN */
struct completion *pde_unload_completion;
struct list_head pde_openers; /* who did ->open, but not ->release */
spinlock_t pde_unload_lock; /* proc_fops checks and pde_users bumps */
umode_t mode;
u8 namelen;
char name[];
} __randomize_layout;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment