Commit 168f75f1 authored by Ben Greear's avatar Ben Greear Committed by Kalle Valo

ath10k: protect ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free with rx_ring.lock

While debugging driver crashes related to a buggy firmware
crashing under load, I noticed that ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free
could be called without being under lock.  I'm not sure if this
is the root cause of the crash or not, but it seems prudent to
protect it.

Originally tested on 4.16+ kernel with ath10k-ct 10.4 firmware
running on 9984 NIC.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
parent 3f04950f
......@@ -268,11 +268,12 @@ int ath10k_htt_rx_ring_refill(struct ath10k *ar)
spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
ret = ath10k_htt_rx_ring_fill_n(htt, (htt->rx_ring.fill_level -
htt->rx_ring.fill_cnt));
spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
if (ret)
ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free(htt);
spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
return ret;
}
......@@ -284,7 +285,9 @@ void ath10k_htt_rx_free(struct ath10k_htt *htt)
skb_queue_purge(&htt->rx_in_ord_compl_q);
skb_queue_purge(&htt->tx_fetch_ind_q);
spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free(htt);
spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
dma_free_coherent(htt->ar->dev,
ath10k_htt_get_rx_ring_size(htt),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment