x86/mm/pkeys: Fix mismerge of protection keys CPUID bits
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790620 commit 0d47638f upstream Kirill Shutemov pointed this out to me. The tip tree currently has commit: dfb4a70f [x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions] whioch added support for two new CPUID bits: X86_FEATURE_PKU and X86_FEATURE_OSPKE. But, those bits were mis-merged and put in cpufeature.h instead of cpufeatures.h. This didn't cause any breakage *except* it keeps the "ospke" and "pku" bits from showing up in cpuinfo. Now cpuinfo has the two new flags: flags : ... pku ospke BTW, is it really wise to have cpufeature.h and cpufeatures.h? It seems like they can only cause confusion and mahem with tab completion. Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160310221213.06F9DB53@viggo.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <matt.helsley@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <ganb@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment