Merge branch 'mptcp-fix-endpoints-with-signal-and-subflow-flags'
Matthieu Baerts says: ==================== mptcp: fix endpoints with 'signal' and 'subflow' flags When looking at improving the user experience around the MPTCP endpoints setup, I noticed that setting an endpoint with both the 'signal' and the 'subflow' flags -- as it has been done in the past by users according to bug reports we got -- was resulting on only announcing the endpoint, but not using it to create subflows: the 'subflow' flag was then ignored. My initial thought was to modify IPRoute2 to warn the user when the two flags were set, but it doesn't sound normal to ignore one of them. I then looked at modifying the kernel not to allow having the two flags set, but when discussing about that with Mat, we thought it was maybe not ideal to do that, as there might be use-cases, we might break some configs. Then I saw it was working before v5.17. So instead, I fixed the support on the kernel side (patch 5) using Paolo's suggestion. This also includes a fix on the options side (patch 1: for v5.11+), an explicit deny of some options combinations (patch 2: for v5.18+), and some refactoring (patches 3 and 4) to ease the inclusion of the patch 5. While at it, I added a new selftest (patch 7) to validate this case -- including a modification of the chk_add_nr helper to inverse the sides were the counters are checked (patch 6) -- and allowed ADD_ADDR echo just after the MP_JOIN 3WHS. The selftests modification have the same Fixes tag as the previous commit, but no 'Cc: Stable': if the backport can work, that's good -- but it still need to be verified by running the selftests -- if not, no need to worry, many CIs will use the selftests from the last stable version to validate previous stable releases. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240731-upstream-net-20240731-mptcp-endp-subflow-signal-v1-0-c8a9b036493b@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment