Commit 1723d39d authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Kees Cook

stackleak: clarify variable names

The logic within __stackleak_erase() can be a little hard to follow, as
`boundary` switches from being the low bound to the high bound mid way
through the function, and `kstack_ptr` is used to represent the start of
the region to erase while `boundary` represents the end of the region to
erase.

Make this a little clearer by consistently using clearer variable names.
The `boundary` variable is removed, the bounds of the region to erase
are described by `erase_low` and `erase_high`, and bounds of the task
stack are described by `task_stack_low` and `task_stack_high`.

As the same time, remove the comment above the variables, since it is
unclear whether it's intended as rationale, a complaint, or a TODO, and
is more confusing than helpful.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427173128.2603085-6-mark.rutland@arm.com
parent 9ec79840
......@@ -73,40 +73,38 @@ late_initcall(stackleak_sysctls_init);
static __always_inline void __stackleak_erase(void)
{
const unsigned long task_stack_low = stackleak_task_low_bound(current);
/* It would be nice not to have 'kstack_ptr' and 'boundary' on stack */
unsigned long kstack_ptr = current->lowest_stack;
unsigned long boundary = task_stack_low;
unsigned long erase_low = current->lowest_stack;
unsigned long erase_high;
unsigned int poison_count = 0;
const unsigned int depth = STACKLEAK_SEARCH_DEPTH / sizeof(unsigned long);
/* Search for the poison value in the kernel stack */
while (kstack_ptr > boundary && poison_count <= depth) {
if (*(unsigned long *)kstack_ptr == STACKLEAK_POISON)
while (erase_low > task_stack_low && poison_count <= depth) {
if (*(unsigned long *)erase_low == STACKLEAK_POISON)
poison_count++;
else
poison_count = 0;
kstack_ptr -= sizeof(unsigned long);
erase_low -= sizeof(unsigned long);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
current->prev_lowest_stack = kstack_ptr;
current->prev_lowest_stack = erase_low;
#endif
/*
* Now write the poison value to the kernel stack. Start from
* 'kstack_ptr' and move up till the new 'boundary'. We assume that
* the stack pointer doesn't change when we write poison.
* Now write the poison value to the kernel stack between 'erase_low'
* and 'erase_high'. We assume that the stack pointer doesn't change
* when we write poison.
*/
if (on_thread_stack())
boundary = current_stack_pointer;
erase_high = current_stack_pointer;
else
boundary = current_top_of_stack();
erase_high = current_top_of_stack();
while (kstack_ptr < boundary) {
*(unsigned long *)kstack_ptr = STACKLEAK_POISON;
kstack_ptr += sizeof(unsigned long);
while (erase_low < erase_high) {
*(unsigned long *)erase_low = STACKLEAK_POISON;
erase_low += sizeof(unsigned long);
}
/* Reset the 'lowest_stack' value for the next syscall */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment