Commit 178c39d9 authored by Jason Yan's avatar Jason Yan Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: mvsas: Use sas_find_attached_phy_id() instead of open coding it

The attached phy finding is open coded. Replace it with
sas_find_attached_phy_id(). To keep things consistent, the return value of
mvs_dev_found_notify() is also changed to -ENODEV after calling
sas_find_attathed_phy_id() failed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220928070130.3657183-5-yanaijie@huawei.comReviewed-by: default avatarJack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent ec648586
......@@ -1190,23 +1190,16 @@ static int mvs_dev_found_notify(struct domain_device *dev, int lock)
mvi_device->sas_device = dev;
if (parent_dev && dev_is_expander(parent_dev->dev_type)) {
int phy_id;
u8 phy_num = parent_dev->ex_dev.num_phys;
struct ex_phy *phy;
for (phy_id = 0; phy_id < phy_num; phy_id++) {
phy = &parent_dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id];
if (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr) ==
SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr)) {
mvi_device->attached_phy = phy_id;
break;
}
}
if (phy_id == phy_num) {
phy_id = sas_find_attached_phy_id(&parent_dev->ex_dev, dev);
if (phy_id < 0) {
mv_printk("Error: no attached dev:%016llx"
"at ex:%016llx.\n",
SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr),
SAS_ADDR(parent_dev->sas_addr));
res = -1;
res = phy_id;
} else {
mvi_device->attached_phy = phy_id;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment