[PATCH] owner in irtty-sir

ir259_sir_kthread_Morton-2.diff :
	o [CORRECT] fix module ownership in irtty-sir
	o [FEATURE] important comment in sir_kthread

drivers/net/irda/irtty-sir.c

@@ -504,10 +504,7 @@ static int irtty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	struct sirtty_cb *priv;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	/* unfortunately, there's no tty_ldisc->owner field
-	 * so there is some window for SMP race with rmmod
-	 */
-	MOD_INC_USE_COUNT;
+	/* Module stuff handled via irda_ldisc.owner - Jean II */
 
 	/* First make sure we're not already connected. */
 	if (tty->disc_data != NULL) {
@@ -569,7 +566,6 @@ static int irtty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
 out_put:
 	sirdev_put_instance(dev);
 out:
-	MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -614,8 +610,6 @@ static void irtty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
 		tty->driver->stop(tty);
 
 	kfree(priv);
-
-	MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
 }
 
 /* ------------------------------------------------------- */
@@ -633,6 +627,7 @@ static struct tty_ldisc irda_ldisc = {
 	.receive_buf	= irtty_receive_buf,
 	.receive_room	= irtty_receive_room,
 	.write_wakeup	= irtty_write_wakeup,
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
 /* ------------------------------------------------------- */

drivers/net/irda/sir_kthread.c

@@ -151,6 +151,13 @@ static int irda_thread(void *startup)
 
 	while (irda_rq_queue.thread != NULL) {
 
+		/* We use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, rather than
+		 * TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.  Andrew Morton made this
+		 * change ; he told me that it is safe, because "signal
+		 * blocking is now handled in daemonize()", he added
+		 * that the problem is that "uninterruptible sleep
+		 * contributes to load average", making user worry.
+		 * Jean II */
 		set_task_state(current, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		add_wait_queue(&irda_rq_queue.kick, &wait);
 		if (list_empty(&irda_rq_queue.request_list))