Commit 181f4d2f authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede

pwm: lpss: Fix off by one error in base_unit math in pwm_lpss_prepare()

According to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that
each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and
that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency.

So assuming e.g. a 16 bit counter this means that if base_unit is set to 1,
after 65535 input clock-cycles the counter has been increased from 0 to
65535 and it will overflow on the next cycle, so it will overflow after
every 65536 clock cycles and thus the calculations done in
pwm_lpss_prepare() should use 65536 and not 65535.

This commit fixes this. Note this also aligns the calculations in
pwm_lpss_prepare() with those in pwm_lpss_get_state().

Note this effectively reverts commit 684309e5 ("pwm: lpss: Avoid
potential overflow of base_unit"). The next patch in this series really
fixes the potential overflow of the base_unit value.

Fixes: 684309e5 ("pwm: lpss: Avoid potential overflow of base_unit")
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
parent 15aa5e4c
......@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* The equation is:
* base_unit = round(base_unit_range * freq / c)
*/
base_unit_range = BIT(lpwm->info->base_unit_bits) - 1;
base_unit_range = BIT(lpwm->info->base_unit_bits);
freq *= base_unit_range;
base_unit = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(freq, c);
......@@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm,
orig_ctrl = ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm);
ctrl &= ~PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK;
ctrl &= ~(base_unit_range << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
base_unit &= base_unit_range;
ctrl &= ~((base_unit_range - 1) << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
base_unit &= (base_unit_range - 1);
ctrl |= (u32) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT;
ctrl |= on_time_div;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment