iommu: Track iopf group instead of last fault
Previously, before a group of page faults was passed to the domain's iopf handler, the last page fault of the group was kept in the list of iommu_fault_param::faults. In the page fault response path, the group's last page fault was used to look up the list, and the page faults were responded to device only if there was a matched fault. The previous approach seems unnecessarily complex and not performance friendly. Put the page fault group itself to the outstanding fault list. It can be removed in the page fault response path or in the iopf_queue_remove_device() path. The pending list is protected by iommu_fault_param::lock. To allow checking for the group's presence in the list using list_empty(), the iopf group should be removed from the list with list_del_init(). IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_PASID_VALID is set in the code but not used anywhere. Remove it to make the code clean. IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_PASID_VALID is set in the response message indicating that the response message includes a valid PASID value. Actually, we should keep this hardware detail in the individual driver. When the page fault handling framework in IOMMU and IOMMUFD subsystems includes a valid PASID in the fault message, the response message should always contain the same PASID value. Individual drivers should be responsible for deciding whether to include the PASID in the messages they provide for the hardware. Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Tested-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212012227.119381-15-baolu.lu@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment