Commit 19a39819 authored by Roman Sudarikov's avatar Roman Sudarikov Committed by Peter Zijlstra

perf/x86/intel/uncore: Expose an Uncore unit to PMON mapping

Each Uncore unit type, by its nature, can be mapped to its own context -
which platform component each PMON block of that type is supposed to
monitor.

Intel® Xeon® Scalable processor family (code name Skylake-SP) makes
significant changes in the integrated I/O (IIO) architecture. The new
solution introduces IIO stacks which are responsible for managing traffic
between the PCIe domain and the Mesh domain. Each IIO stack has its own
PMON block and can handle either DMI port, x16 PCIe root port, MCP-Link
or various built-in accelerators. IIO PMON blocks allow concurrent
monitoring of I/O flows up to 4 x4 bifurcation within each IIO stack.

Software is supposed to program required perf counters within each IIO
stack and gather performance data. The tricky thing here is that IIO PMON
reports data per IIO stack but users have no idea what IIO stacks are -
they only know devices which are connected to the platform.

Understanding IIO stack concept to find which IIO stack that particular
IO device is connected to, or to identify an IIO PMON block to program
for monitoring specific IIO stack assumes a lot of implicit knowledge
about given Intel server platform architecture.

Usage example:
    ls /sys/devices/uncore_<type>_<pmu_idx>/die*
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoman Sudarikov <roman.sudarikov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200601083543.30011-2-alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com
parent f0171973
......@@ -846,10 +846,12 @@ static int uncore_pmu_register(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu)
.read = uncore_pmu_event_read,
.module = THIS_MODULE,
.capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
.attr_update = pmu->type->attr_update,
};
} else {
pmu->pmu = *pmu->type->pmu;
pmu->pmu.attr_groups = pmu->type->attr_groups;
pmu->pmu.attr_update = pmu->type->attr_update;
}
if (pmu->type->num_boxes == 1) {
......@@ -890,6 +892,9 @@ static void uncore_type_exit(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu = type->pmus;
int i;
if (type->cleanup_mapping)
type->cleanup_mapping(type);
if (pmu) {
for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++, pmu++) {
uncore_pmu_unregister(pmu);
......@@ -957,6 +962,9 @@ static int __init uncore_type_init(struct intel_uncore_type *type, bool setid)
type->pmu_group = &uncore_pmu_attr_group;
if (type->set_mapping)
type->set_mapping(type);
return 0;
err:
......
......@@ -73,7 +73,19 @@ struct intel_uncore_type {
struct uncore_event_desc *event_descs;
struct freerunning_counters *freerunning;
const struct attribute_group *attr_groups[4];
const struct attribute_group **attr_update;
struct pmu *pmu; /* for custom pmu ops */
/*
* Uncore PMU would store relevant platform topology configuration here
* to identify which platform component each PMON block of that type is
* supposed to monitor.
*/
u64 *topology;
/*
* Optional callbacks for managing mapping of Uncore units to PMONs
*/
int (*set_mapping)(struct intel_uncore_type *type);
void (*cleanup_mapping)(struct intel_uncore_type *type);
};
#define pmu_group attr_groups[0]
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment