Commit 1bbf0b8d authored by Joel Becker's avatar Joel Becker

ocfs2: ocfs2_rotate_tree_right() doesn't need struct inode.

We don't need struct inode in ocfs2_rotate_tree_right() anymore.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
parent 6136ca5f
......@@ -2308,7 +2308,7 @@ static int ocfs2_leftmost_rec_contains(struct ocfs2_extent_list *el, u32 cpos)
* *ret_left_path will contain a valid path which can be passed to
* ocfs2_insert_path().
*/
static int ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(struct inode *inode, handle_t *handle,
static int ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(handle_t *handle,
struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et,
enum ocfs2_split_type split,
u32 insert_cpos,
......@@ -4254,7 +4254,7 @@ static int ocfs2_do_insert_extent(struct inode *inode,
* can wind up skipping both of these two special cases...
*/
if (rotate) {
ret = ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(inode, handle, et, type->ins_split,
ret = ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(handle, et, type->ins_split,
le32_to_cpu(insert_rec->e_cpos),
right_path, &left_path);
if (ret) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment