Commit 1bc261fa authored by Jamie Lentin's avatar Jamie Lentin Committed by David S. Miller

net: mv88e6xxx: Fix ingress rate removal for mv6131 chips

The PORT_RATE_CONTROL register works differently on 88e6095/6095f/6131
in comparison to 6123/61/65, and 0x0 disables. The distinction was lost
Linux 4.1 --> 4.2
Signed-off-by: default avatarJamie Lentin <jm@lentin.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f64f1482
......@@ -2656,15 +2656,19 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
return ret;
}
/* Rate Control: disable ingress rate limiting. */
if (mv88e6xxx_6352_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6351_family(chip) ||
mv88e6xxx_6165_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6097_family(chip) ||
mv88e6xxx_6185_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6095_family(chip) ||
mv88e6xxx_6320_family(chip)) {
/* Rate Control: disable ingress rate limiting. */
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(chip, REG_PORT(port),
PORT_RATE_CONTROL, 0x0001);
if (ret)
return ret;
} else if (mv88e6xxx_6185_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6095_family(chip)) {
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(chip, REG_PORT(port),
PORT_RATE_CONTROL, 0x0000);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
/* Port Control 1: disable trunking, disable sending
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment