Commit 1c0ca902 authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: don't call cpufreq_update_policy() on CPU addition

cpufreq_update_policy() is called from two places currently. From a
workqueue handled queued from cpufreq_bp_resume() for boot CPU and
from cpufreq_cpu_callback() whenever a CPU is added.

The first one makes sure that boot CPU is running on the frequency
present in policy->cpu. But we don't really need a call from
cpufreq_cpu_callback(), because we always call cpufreq_driver->init()
(which will set policy->cur correctly) whenever first CPU of any
policy is added back. And so every policy structure is guaranteed to
have the right frequency in policy->cur.
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent d9a789c7
......@@ -2175,7 +2175,6 @@ static int cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_ONLINE:
__cpufreq_add_dev(dev, NULL, frozen);
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment