Commit 1c645bf4 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Use full serialisation around engine->irq_posted

Using engine->irq_posted for execlists, we are not always serialised by
the tasklet as we supposed. On the reset paths, the tasklet is disabled
and ignored. Instead, we manipulate the engine->irq_posted directly to
account for the reset, but if an interrupt fired before the reset and so
wrote to engine->irq_posted, that write may not be flushed from the
local CPU's cacheline until much later as the tasklet is already active
and so does not generate a mb(). To correctly serialise the interrupt
with reset, we need serialisation on the set_bit() itself.

And at last Mika can be happy.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322073533.5313-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent a90507d6
......@@ -1405,10 +1405,9 @@ gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir)
bool tasklet = false;
if (iir & GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT) {
if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) {
__set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
tasklet = true;
}
if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active))
tasklet = !test_and_set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST,
&engine->irq_posted);
}
if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment