Commit 1ca9b8da authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915/gt: Remove repeated words from comments

Checkpatch spotted a few repeated words in the comment, genuine
mistakes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122192913.4518-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 2f8aa3b8
......@@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ static void execlists_release(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
static void
logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
/* Default vfuncs which can be overriden by each engine. */
/* Default vfuncs which can be overridden by each engine. */
engine->resume = execlists_resume;
......
......@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int i915_ggtt_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
}
/*
* Certain Gen5 chipsets require require idling the GPU before
* Certain Gen5 chipsets require idling the GPU before
* unmapping anything from the GTT when VT-d is enabled.
*/
static bool needs_idle_maps(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
......
......@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct intel_reset {
*
* #I915_WEDGED_ON_INIT - If we fail to initialize the GPU we can no
* longer use the GPU - similar to #I915_WEDGED bit. The difference in
* in the way we're handling "forced" unwedged (e.g. through debugfs),
* the way we're handling "forced" unwedged (e.g. through debugfs),
* which is not allowed in case we failed to initialize.
*
* #I915_WEDGED_ON_FINI - Similar to #I915_WEDGED_ON_INIT, except we
......
......@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void gen8_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
PARTIAL_INSTRUCTION_SHOOTDOWN_DISABLE);
/* Use Force Non-Coherent whenever executing a 3D context. This is a
* workaround for for a possible hang in the unlikely event a TLB
* workaround for a possible hang in the unlikely event a TLB
* invalidation occurs during a PSD flush.
*/
/* WaForceEnableNonCoherent:bdw,chv */
......
......@@ -2864,7 +2864,7 @@ static int __live_preempt_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
err = wait_for_submit(engine, rq, HZ / 2);
i915_request_put(rq);
if (err) {
pr_err("%s: preemption request was not submited\n",
pr_err("%s: preemption request was not submitted\n",
engine->name);
err = -ETIME;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment