Commit 1d582723 authored by Dan Carpenter's avatar Dan Carpenter Committed by Linus Torvalds

ufs: fix truncated values handling 64 bit metadata

Originally i_lastfrag was 32 bits but then we added support for handling
64 bit metadata and it became a 64 bit variable.  That was during 2007, in
54fb996a "[PATCH] ufs2 write: block allocation update".  Unfortunately
these casts got left behind so the value got truncated to 32 bit again.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove now-unneeded min_t/max_t casting]
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 9796cc96
...@@ -424,8 +424,7 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment, ...@@ -424,8 +424,7 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment,
ufs_cpu_to_data_ptr(sb, p, result); ufs_cpu_to_data_ptr(sb, p, result);
*err = 0; *err = 0;
UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag =
max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, max(UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count);
fragment + count);
ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount,
newcount - oldcount, locked_page != NULL); newcount - oldcount, locked_page != NULL);
} }
...@@ -440,7 +439,8 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment, ...@@ -440,7 +439,8 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment,
result = ufs_add_fragments (inode, tmp, oldcount, newcount, err); result = ufs_add_fragments (inode, tmp, oldcount, newcount, err);
if (result) { if (result) {
*err = 0; *err = 0;
UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count); UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max(UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag,
fragment + count);
ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount, ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount,
locked_page != NULL); locked_page != NULL);
unlock_super(sb); unlock_super(sb);
...@@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment, ...@@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment,
uspi->s_sbbase + result, locked_page); uspi->s_sbbase + result, locked_page);
ufs_cpu_to_data_ptr(sb, p, result); ufs_cpu_to_data_ptr(sb, p, result);
*err = 0; *err = 0;
UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count); UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max(UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag,
fragment + count);
unlock_super(sb); unlock_super(sb);
if (newcount < request) if (newcount < request)
ufs_free_fragments (inode, result + newcount, request - newcount); ufs_free_fragments (inode, result + newcount, request - newcount);
......
...@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int ufs_trunc_direct(struct inode *inode) ...@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int ufs_trunc_direct(struct inode *inode)
retry = 0; retry = 0;
frag1 = DIRECT_FRAGMENT; frag1 = DIRECT_FRAGMENT;
frag4 = min_t(u32, UFS_NDIR_FRAGMENT, ufsi->i_lastfrag); frag4 = min_t(u64, UFS_NDIR_FRAGMENT, ufsi->i_lastfrag);
frag2 = ((frag1 & uspi->s_fpbmask) ? ((frag1 | uspi->s_fpbmask) + 1) : frag1); frag2 = ((frag1 & uspi->s_fpbmask) ? ((frag1 | uspi->s_fpbmask) + 1) : frag1);
frag3 = frag4 & ~uspi->s_fpbmask; frag3 = frag4 & ~uspi->s_fpbmask;
block1 = block2 = 0; block1 = block2 = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment