Commit 1f1947ae authored by Vratislav Bendel's avatar Vratislav Bendel Committed by Stefan Bader

xfs: Correctly invert xfs_buftarg LRU isolation logic

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851549

commit 19957a18 upstream.

Due to an inverted logic mistake in xfs_buftarg_isolate()
the xfs_buffers with zero b_lru_ref will take another trip
around LRU, while isolating buffers with non-zero b_lru_ref.

Additionally those isolated buffers end up right back on the LRU
once they are released, because b_lru_ref remains elevated.

Fix that circuitous route by leaving them on the LRU
as originally intended.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVratislav Bendel <vbendel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Lyakas <alex@zadara.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarConnor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKhalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
parent c06201c0
...@@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_isolate( ...@@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_isolate(
* zero. If the value is already zero, we need to reclaim the * zero. If the value is already zero, we need to reclaim the
* buffer, otherwise it gets another trip through the LRU. * buffer, otherwise it gets another trip through the LRU.
*/ */
if (!atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) { if (atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock); spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock);
return LRU_ROTATE; return LRU_ROTATE;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment