Commit 1f7585f3 authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva

ARM: ep93xx: Mark expected switch fall-through

Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm):

arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do':
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may
fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state));
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here
     case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT:
     ^~~~

Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is
modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
Reported-by: default avatarkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
parent fccf01b6
...@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int crunch_do(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *t) ...@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int crunch_do(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *t)
* FALLTHROUGH: Ensure we don't try to overwrite our newly * FALLTHROUGH: Ensure we don't try to overwrite our newly
* initialised state information on the first fault. * initialised state information on the first fault.
*/ */
/* Fall through */
case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT:
crunch_task_release(thread); crunch_task_release(thread);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment