Commit 20bb25d1 authored by Ralf Baechle's avatar Ralf Baechle

[MIPS] SMTC: Fix false trigger of debug code on single VPE.

Make smtc_setup_irq() update the list of interrupts which need to be
watched by the debug code itself.  Also there is no need to initialize the
IPI swint when running with a single VPE, so don't initialize it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
parent ae036b79
......@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static struct smtc_ipi_q freeIPIq;
void ipi_decode(struct smtc_ipi *);
static void post_direct_ipi(int cpu, struct smtc_ipi *pipi);
static void setup_cross_vpe_interrupts(void);
static void setup_cross_vpe_interrupts(unsigned int nvpe);
void init_smtc_stats(void);
/* Global SMTC Status */
......@@ -170,7 +170,10 @@ __setup("tintq=", tintq);
int imstuckcount[2][8];
/* vpemask represents IM/IE bits of per-VPE Status registers, low-to-high */
int vpemask[2][8] = {{0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1},{0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1}};
int vpemask[2][8] = {
{0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1},
{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1}
};
int tcnoprog[NR_CPUS];
static atomic_t idle_hook_initialized = {0};
static int clock_hang_reported[NR_CPUS];
......@@ -503,8 +506,7 @@ void mipsmt_prepare_cpus(void)
/* If we have multiple VPEs running, set up the cross-VPE interrupt */
if (nvpe > 1)
setup_cross_vpe_interrupts();
setup_cross_vpe_interrupts(nvpe);
/* Set up queue of free IPI "messages". */
nipi = NR_CPUS * IPIBUF_PER_CPU;
......@@ -609,7 +611,12 @@ void smtc_cpus_done(void)
int setup_irq_smtc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction * new,
unsigned long hwmask)
{
unsigned int vpe = current_cpu_data.vpe_id;
irq_hwmask[irq] = hwmask;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMTC_IDLE_HOOK_DEBUG
vpemask[vpe][irq - MIPSCPU_INT_BASE] = 1;
#endif
return setup_irq(irq, new);
}
......@@ -970,8 +977,11 @@ static void ipi_irq_dispatch(void)
static struct irqaction irq_ipi;
static void setup_cross_vpe_interrupts(void)
static void setup_cross_vpe_interrupts(unsigned int nvpe)
{
if (nvpe < 1)
return;
if (!cpu_has_vint)
panic("SMTC Kernel requires Vectored Interupt support");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment