Commit 20c3a024 authored by Lucas De Marchi's avatar Lucas De Marchi

drm/xe/kunit: Rename count to count_sr_entries

The RTP tests check both the result of processing the RTP entries and
the outcome saved as SR entries. Rename "count" to be explicit about
what's being counted.
Reviewed-by: default avatarGustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
parent e525473f
......@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct rtp_test_case {
struct xe_reg expected_reg;
u32 expected_set_bits;
u32 expected_clr_bits;
unsigned long expected_count;
unsigned long expected_count_sr_entries;
unsigned int expected_sr_errors;
const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr *entries;
};
......@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0) | REG_BIT(1),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0) | REG_BIT(1),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
/* Different bits on the same register: create a single entry */
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
/* Don't coalesce second entry since rules don't match */
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0) | REG_BIT(1) | REG_BIT(2),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0) | REG_BIT(1) | REG_BIT(2),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("first"),
XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes), OR, FUNC(match_no)),
......@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
{
.name = "match-or-xfail",
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_count = 0,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 0,
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("leading-or"),
XE_RTP_RULES(OR, FUNC(match_yes)),
......@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
/* Don't coalesce second entry due to one of the rules */
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 2,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 2,
/* Same bits on different registers are not coalesced */
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(1) | REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
/* Check clr vs set actions on different bits */
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = TEMP_FIELD,
.expected_clr_bits = TEMP_MASK,
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
/* Check FIELD_SET works */
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
.expected_sr_errors = 1,
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
.expected_sr_errors = 1,
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case cases[] = {
.expected_reg = REGULAR_REG1,
.expected_set_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_clr_bits = REG_BIT(0),
.expected_count = 1,
.expected_count_sr_entries = 1,
.expected_sr_errors = 2,
.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr[]) {
{ XE_RTP_NAME("basic-1"),
......@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void xe_rtp_process_tests(struct kunit *test)
struct xe_reg_sr *reg_sr = &gt->reg_sr;
const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *sre, *sr_entry = NULL;
struct xe_rtp_process_ctx ctx = XE_RTP_PROCESS_CTX_INITIALIZER(gt);
unsigned long idx, count = 0;
unsigned long idx, count_sr_entries = 0;
xe_reg_sr_init(reg_sr, "xe_rtp_tests", xe);
xe_rtp_process_to_sr(&ctx, param->entries, reg_sr);
......@@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ static void xe_rtp_process_tests(struct kunit *test)
if (idx == param->expected_reg.addr)
sr_entry = sre;
count++;
count_sr_entries++;
}
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, param->expected_count);
if (count) {
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count_sr_entries, param->expected_count_sr_entries);
if (count_sr_entries) {
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sr_entry->clr_bits, param->expected_clr_bits);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sr_entry->set_bits, param->expected_set_bits);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sr_entry->reg.raw, param->expected_reg.raw);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment