Commit 2254a739 authored by Darrick J. Wong's avatar Darrick J. Wong Committed by Dave Chinner

xfs: fix xfs_inodegc_stop racing with mod_delayed_work

syzbot reported this warning from the faux inodegc shrinker that tries
to kick off inodegc work:

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 102 at kernel/workqueue.c:1445 __queue_work+0xd44/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:1444
RIP: 0010:__queue_work+0xd44/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:1444
Call Trace:
 __queue_delayed_work+0x1c8/0x270 kernel/workqueue.c:1672
 mod_delayed_work_on+0xe1/0x220 kernel/workqueue.c:1746
 xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:2212 [inline]
 xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan+0x250/0x4f0 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:2191
 do_shrink_slab+0x428/0xaa0 mm/vmscan.c:853
 shrink_slab+0x175/0x660 mm/vmscan.c:1013
 shrink_one+0x502/0x810 mm/vmscan.c:5343
 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5394 [inline]
 lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5511 [inline]
 shrink_node+0x2064/0x35f0 mm/vmscan.c:6459
 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7262 [inline]
 balance_pgdat+0xa02/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7452
 kswapd+0x677/0xd60 mm/vmscan.c:7712
 kthread+0x2e8/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308

This warning corresponds to this code in __queue_work:

	/*
	 * For a draining wq, only works from the same workqueue are
	 * allowed. The __WQ_DESTROYING helps to spot the issue that
	 * queues a new work item to a wq after destroy_workqueue(wq).
	 */
	if (unlikely(wq->flags & (__WQ_DESTROYING | __WQ_DRAINING) &&
		     WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq))))
		return;

For this to trip, we must have a thread draining the inodedgc workqueue
and a second thread trying to queue inodegc work to that workqueue.
This can happen if freezing or a ro remount race with reclaim poking our
faux inodegc shrinker and another thread dropping an unlinked O_RDONLY
file:

Thread 0	Thread 1	Thread 2

xfs_inodegc_stop

				xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan
				xfs_is_inodegc_enabled
				<yes, will continue>

xfs_clear_inodegc_enabled
xfs_inodegc_queue_all
<list empty, do not queue inodegc worker>

		xfs_inodegc_queue
		<add to list>
		xfs_is_inodegc_enabled
		<no, returns>

drain_workqueue
<set WQ_DRAINING>

				llist_empty
				<no, will queue list>
				mod_delayed_work_on(..., 0)
				__queue_work
				<sees WQ_DRAINING, kaboom>

In other words, everything between the access to inodegc_enabled state
and the decision to poke the inodegc workqueue requires some kind of
coordination to avoid the WQ_DRAINING state.  We could perhaps introduce
a lock here, but we could also try to eliminate WQ_DRAINING from the
picture.

We could replace the drain_workqueue call with a loop that flushes the
workqueue and queues workers as long as there is at least one inode
present in the per-cpu inodegc llists.  We've disabled inodegc at this
point, so we know that the number of queued inodes will eventually hit
zero as long as xfs_inodegc_start cannot reactivate the workers.

There are four callers of xfs_inodegc_start.  Three of them come from the
VFS with s_umount held: filesystem thawing, failed filesystem freezing,
and the rw remount transition.  The fourth caller is mounting rw (no
remount or freezing possible).

There are three callers ofs xfs_inodegc_stop.  One is unmounting (no
remount or thaw possible).  Two of them come from the VFS with s_umount
held: fs freezing and ro remount transition.

Hence, it is correct to replace the drain_workqueue call with a loop
that drains the inodegc llists.

Fixes: 6191cf3a ("xfs: flush inodegc workqueue tasks before cancel")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
parent 2d5f38a3
......@@ -435,18 +435,23 @@ xfs_iget_check_free_state(
}
/* Make all pending inactivation work start immediately. */
static void
static bool
xfs_inodegc_queue_all(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
struct xfs_inodegc *gc;
int cpu;
bool ret = false;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
gc = per_cpu_ptr(mp->m_inodegc, cpu);
if (!llist_empty(&gc->list))
if (!llist_empty(&gc->list)) {
mod_delayed_work_on(cpu, mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work, 0);
ret = true;
}
}
return ret;
}
/*
......@@ -1911,24 +1916,41 @@ xfs_inodegc_flush(
/*
* Flush all the pending work and then disable the inode inactivation background
* workers and wait for them to stop.
* workers and wait for them to stop. Caller must hold sb->s_umount to
* coordinate changes in the inodegc_enabled state.
*/
void
xfs_inodegc_stop(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
bool rerun;
if (!xfs_clear_inodegc_enabled(mp))
return;
/*
* Drain all pending inodegc work, including inodes that could be
* queued by racing xfs_inodegc_queue or xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan
* threads that sample the inodegc state just prior to us clearing it.
* The inodegc flag state prevents new threads from queuing more
* inodes, so we queue pending work items and flush the workqueue until
* all inodegc lists are empty. IOWs, we cannot use drain_workqueue
* here because it does not allow other unserialized mechanisms to
* reschedule inodegc work while this draining is in progress.
*/
xfs_inodegc_queue_all(mp);
drain_workqueue(mp->m_inodegc_wq);
do {
flush_workqueue(mp->m_inodegc_wq);
rerun = xfs_inodegc_queue_all(mp);
} while (rerun);
trace_xfs_inodegc_stop(mp, __return_address);
}
/*
* Enable the inode inactivation background workers and schedule deferred inode
* inactivation work if there is any.
* inactivation work if there is any. Caller must hold sb->s_umount to
* coordinate changes in the inodegc_enabled state.
*/
void
xfs_inodegc_start(
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment