Commit 248e2515 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915/fbc: Eliminate racy intel_fbc_is_active() usage

The ilk fbc watermark computation uses intel_fbc_is_active() which
is racy since we don't know whether FBC will be enabled or not at
some point. So let's just assume it will be if both HAS_FBC()
and the modparam agree.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211124113652.22090-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarMika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
parent d96c5ed0
...@@ -3369,13 +3369,8 @@ static void ilk_wm_merge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, ...@@ -3369,13 +3369,8 @@ static void ilk_wm_merge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
} }
/* ILK: LP2+ must be disabled when FBC WM is disabled but FBC enabled */ /* ILK: LP2+ must be disabled when FBC WM is disabled but FBC enabled */
/* if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 5 && HAS_FBC(dev_priv) &&
* FIXME this is racy. FBC might get enabled later. dev_priv->params.enable_fbc && !merged->fbc_wm_enabled) {
* What we should check here is whether FBC can be
* enabled sometime later.
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 5 && !merged->fbc_wm_enabled &&
intel_fbc_is_active(&dev_priv->fbc)) {
for (level = 2; level <= max_level; level++) { for (level = 2; level <= max_level; level++) {
struct intel_wm_level *wm = &merged->wm[level]; struct intel_wm_level *wm = &merged->wm[level];
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment