Commit 256a9978 authored by Richard Fitzgerald's avatar Richard Fitzgerald Committed by Vinod Koul

soundwire: bus: Prevent lockdep asserts when stream has multiple buses

Give the bus_lock and msg_lock of each bus a different unique key
so that it is possible to acquire the locks of multiple buses
without lockdep asserting a possible deadlock.

Using mutex_init() to initialize a mutex gives all those mutexes
the same lock class. Lockdep checking treats it as an error to
attempt to take a mutex while already holding a mutex of the same
class. This causes a lockdep assert when sdw_acquire_bus_lock()
attempts to lock multiple buses, and when do_bank_switch() takes
multiple msg_lock.

[  138.697350] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[  138.697366] 6.3.0-test #1 Tainted: G            E
[  138.697380] --------------------------------------------
[  138.697394] play/903 is trying to acquire lock:
[  138.697409] ffff99b8c41aa8c8 (&bus->bus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
sdw_prepare_stream+0x52/0x2e0
[  138.697443]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  138.697468] ffff99b8c41af8c8 (&bus->bus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
sdw_prepare_stream+0x52/0x2e0
[  138.697493]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[  138.697521]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  138.697540]        CPU0
[  138.697550]        ----
[  138.697559]   lock(&bus->bus_lock);
[  138.697570]   lock(&bus->bus_lock);
[  138.697581]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

Giving each mutex a unique key allows multiple to be held
without triggering a lockdep assert. But note that it does not
allow them to be taken in one order then a different order.
If two mutexes are taken in the order A, B then they must
always be taken in that order otherwise they could deadlock.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615141208.679011-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.comSigned-off-by: default avatarVinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
parent 490937d4
......@@ -69,8 +69,17 @@ int sdw_bus_master_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct device *parent,
return -EINVAL;
}
mutex_init(&bus->msg_lock);
mutex_init(&bus->bus_lock);
/*
* Give each bus_lock and msg_lock a unique key so that lockdep won't
* trigger a deadlock warning when the locks of several buses are
* grabbed during configuration of a multi-bus stream.
*/
lockdep_register_key(&bus->msg_lock_key);
__mutex_init(&bus->msg_lock, "msg_lock", &bus->msg_lock_key);
lockdep_register_key(&bus->bus_lock_key);
__mutex_init(&bus->bus_lock, "bus_lock", &bus->bus_lock_key);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bus->slaves);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bus->m_rt_list);
......@@ -181,6 +190,8 @@ void sdw_bus_master_delete(struct sdw_bus *bus)
sdw_master_device_del(bus);
sdw_bus_debugfs_exit(bus);
lockdep_unregister_key(&bus->bus_lock_key);
lockdep_unregister_key(&bus->msg_lock_key);
ida_free(&sdw_bus_ida, bus->id);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_bus_master_delete);
......
......@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#define __SOUNDWIRE_H
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/lockdep_types.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
......@@ -907,7 +908,9 @@ struct sdw_bus {
struct list_head slaves;
DECLARE_BITMAP(assigned, SDW_MAX_DEVICES);
struct mutex bus_lock;
struct lock_class_key bus_lock_key;
struct mutex msg_lock;
struct lock_class_key msg_lock_key;
int (*compute_params)(struct sdw_bus *bus);
const struct sdw_master_ops *ops;
const struct sdw_master_port_ops *port_ops;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment