Commit 25ddd738 authored by Milton Miller's avatar Milton Miller Committed by Paul Mackerras

powerpc: Provide a separate handler for each IPI action

With the new generic smp call function helpers, I noticed the code in
smp_message_recv was a single function call in many cases.  While
getting the message number from the ipi data is easy, we can reduce
the path length by a function and data-dependent switch by registering
seperate IPI actions for these simple calls.

Originally I left the ipi action array exposed, but then I realized the
registration code should be common too.

The three users each had their own name array, so I made a fourth
to convert all users to use a common one.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMilton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
parent a6326e98
...@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ extern int cpu_to_core_id(int cpu); ...@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ extern int cpu_to_core_id(int cpu);
#define PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE 2 #define PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE 2
#define PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK 3 #define PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK 3
/*
* irq controllers that have dedicated ipis per message and don't
* need additional code in the action handler may use this
*/
extern int smp_request_message_ipi(int virq, int message);
extern const char *smp_ipi_name[];
void smp_init_iSeries(void); void smp_init_iSeries(void);
void smp_init_pSeries(void); void smp_init_pSeries(void);
void smp_init_cell(void); void smp_init_cell(void);
......
...@@ -123,6 +123,65 @@ void smp_message_recv(int msg) ...@@ -123,6 +123,65 @@ void smp_message_recv(int msg)
} }
} }
static irqreturn_t call_function_action(int irq, void *data)
{
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static irqreturn_t reschedule_action(int irq, void *data)
{
/* we just need the return path side effect of checking need_resched */
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static irqreturn_t call_function_single_action(int irq, void *data)
{
generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static irqreturn_t debug_ipi_action(int irq, void *data)
{
smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static irq_handler_t smp_ipi_action[] = {
[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION] = call_function_action,
[PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE] = reschedule_action,
[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE] = call_function_single_action,
[PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK] = debug_ipi_action,
};
const char *smp_ipi_name[] = {
[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION] = "ipi call function",
[PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE] = "ipi reschedule",
[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE] = "ipi call function single",
[PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK] = "ipi debugger",
};
/* optional function to request ipi, for controllers with >= 4 ipis */
int smp_request_message_ipi(int virq, int msg)
{
int err;
if (msg < 0 || msg > PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK) {
return -EINVAL;
}
#if !defined(CONFIG_DEBUGGER) && !defined(CONFIG_KEXEC)
if (msg == PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK) {
return 1;
}
#endif
err = request_irq(virq, smp_ipi_action[msg], IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU,
smp_ipi_name[msg], 0);
WARN(err < 0, "unable to request_irq %d for %s (rc %d)\n",
virq, smp_ipi_name[msg], err);
return err;
}
void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
{ {
if (likely(smp_ops)) if (likely(smp_ops))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment