Commit 264ddd07 authored by Emil Velikov's avatar Emil Velikov

drm/auth: make drm_{set,drop}master_ioctl symmetrical

Currently the ret handling is all over the place - with two redundant
assignments and another one addressed earlier.

Use the exact same flow in both functions.

v2: straighten the code flow, instead of just removing the assignments

Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEmil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200530124640.4176323-2-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com
parent 907f5320
......@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ drm_master_check_perm(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
int drm_setmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv)
{
int ret = 0;
int ret;
mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
......@@ -272,12 +272,15 @@ int drm_dropmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (ret)
goto out_unlock;
ret = -EINVAL;
if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))
if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
if (!dev->master)
if (!dev->master) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
if (file_priv->master->lessor != NULL) {
DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Attempt to drop lessee %d as master\n", file_priv->master->lessee_id);
......@@ -285,7 +288,6 @@ int drm_dropmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto out_unlock;
}
ret = 0;
drm_drop_master(dev, file_priv);
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment