Commit 266883f2 authored by Steffen Maier's avatar Steffen Maier Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: zfcp: decouple TMF response handler from scsi_cmnd

Originally, I planned for TMF handling to have different context data in
fsf_req->data depending on the TMF scope in fcp_cmnd->fc_tm_flags:

 * scsi_device if FCP_TMF_LUN_RESET,
 * zfcp_port if FCP_TMF_TGT_RESET.

However, the FCP channel requires a valid LUN handle so we now use
scsi_device as context data with any TMF for the time being.

Regular SCSI I/O FCP requests continue using scsi_cmnd as req->data.

Hence, the callers of zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common() must resolve req->data
and pass scsi_device as common context.  While at it, remove the detour
zfcp_sdev->port->adapter and use the more direct req->adapter as elsewhere
in this function already.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBenjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent 82212118
......@@ -2036,10 +2036,14 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_req_trace(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req, struct scsi_cmnd *scsi)
sizeof(blktrc));
}
static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
/**
* zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common() - FCP response handler common to I/O and TMF.
* @req: Pointer to FSF request.
* @sdev: Pointer to SCSI device as request context.
*/
static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req,
struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd = req->data;
struct scsi_device *sdev = scmnd->device;
struct zfcp_scsi_dev *zfcp_sdev;
struct fsf_qtcb_header *header = &req->qtcb->header;
......@@ -2051,7 +2055,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
switch (header->fsf_status) {
case FSF_HANDLE_MISMATCH:
case FSF_PORT_HANDLE_NOT_VALID:
zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(zfcp_sdev->port->adapter, 0, "fssfch1");
zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(req->adapter, 0, "fssfch1");
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
break;
case FSF_FCPLUN_NOT_VALID:
......@@ -2069,8 +2073,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
req->qtcb->bottom.io.data_direction,
(unsigned long long)zfcp_scsi_dev_lun(sdev),
(unsigned long long)zfcp_sdev->port->wwpn);
zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(zfcp_sdev->port->adapter, 0,
"fssfch3");
zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(req->adapter, 0, "fssfch3");
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
break;
case FSF_CMND_LENGTH_NOT_VALID:
......@@ -2080,8 +2083,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
req->qtcb->bottom.io.fcp_cmnd_length,
(unsigned long long)zfcp_scsi_dev_lun(sdev),
(unsigned long long)zfcp_sdev->port->wwpn);
zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(zfcp_sdev->port->adapter, 0,
"fssfch4");
zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(req->adapter, 0, "fssfch4");
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
break;
case FSF_PORT_BOXED:
......@@ -2120,7 +2122,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_cmnd_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
return;
}
zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(req);
zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(req, scpnt->device);
if (unlikely(req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR)) {
set_host_byte(scpnt, DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED);
......@@ -2297,10 +2299,11 @@ int zfcp_fsf_fcp_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scsi_cmnd)
static void zfcp_fsf_fcp_task_mgmt_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
{
struct scsi_device *sdev = req->data;
struct fcp_resp_with_ext *fcp_rsp;
struct fcp_resp_rsp_info *rsp_info;
zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(req);
zfcp_fsf_fcp_handler_common(req, sdev);
fcp_rsp = &req->qtcb->bottom.io.fcp_rsp.iu;
rsp_info = (struct fcp_resp_rsp_info *) &fcp_rsp[1];
......@@ -2341,7 +2344,7 @@ struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_fcp_task_mgmt(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
goto out;
}
req->data = scmnd;
req->data = scmnd->device;
req->handler = zfcp_fsf_fcp_task_mgmt_handler;
req->qtcb->header.lun_handle = zfcp_sdev->lun_handle;
req->qtcb->header.port_handle = zfcp_sdev->port->handle;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment