Commit 26dea343 authored by Nathan Chancellor's avatar Nathan Chancellor Committed by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

backlight: lm3639: Unconditionally call led_classdev_unregister

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853881

[ Upstream commit 7cea645a ]

Clang warns that the address of a pointer will always evaluated as true
in a boolean context.

drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:403:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_torch' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/backlight/lm3639_bl.c:405:14: warning: address of
'pchip->cdev_flash' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
        if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
        ~~   ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.

These statements have been present since 2012, introduced by
commit 0f59858d ("backlight: add new lm3639 backlight
driver"). Given that they have been called unconditionally since
then presumably without any issues, removing the always true if
statements to fix the warnings without any real world changes.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/119Signed-off-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarConnor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKhalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
parent b0015f94
......@@ -400,10 +400,8 @@ static int lm3639_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
regmap_write(pchip->regmap, REG_ENABLE, 0x00);
if (&pchip->cdev_torch)
led_classdev_unregister(&pchip->cdev_torch);
if (&pchip->cdev_flash)
led_classdev_unregister(&pchip->cdev_flash);
led_classdev_unregister(&pchip->cdev_torch);
led_classdev_unregister(&pchip->cdev_flash);
if (pchip->bled)
device_remove_file(&(pchip->bled->dev), &dev_attr_bled_mode);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment