Commit 27fb7010 authored by Logan Gunthorpe's avatar Logan Gunthorpe Committed by Jens Axboe

md/raid5: Refactor raid5_make_request loop

Break immediately if raid5_get_active_stripe() returns NULL and deindent
the rest of the loop. Annotate this check with an unlikely().

This makes the code easier to read and reduces the indentation level.

No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLogan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGuoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSong Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent a8bb304c
......@@ -5902,68 +5902,69 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
sh = raid5_get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, previous,
(bi->bi_opf & REQ_RAHEAD), 0);
if (sh) {
if (unlikely(previous)) {
/* expansion might have moved on while waiting for a
* stripe, so we must do the range check again.
* Expansion could still move past after this
* test, but as we are holding a reference to
* 'sh', we know that if that happens,
* STRIPE_EXPANDING will get set and the expansion
* won't proceed until we finish with the stripe.
*/
int must_retry = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
if (!ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
conf->reshape_progress))
/* mismatch, need to try again */
must_retry = 1;
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
if (must_retry) {
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
schedule();
do_prepare = true;
goto retry;
}
}
if (read_seqcount_retry(&conf->gen_lock, seq)) {
/* Might have got the wrong stripe_head
* by accident
*/
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
goto retry;
}
if (unlikely(!sh)) {
/* cannot get stripe, just give-up */
bi->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
break;
}
if (test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state) ||
!add_stripe_bio(sh, bi, dd_idx, rw, previous)) {
/* Stripe is busy expanding or
* add failed due to overlap. Flush everything
* and wait a while
*/
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
if (unlikely(previous)) {
/* expansion might have moved on while waiting for a
* stripe, so we must do the range check again.
* Expansion could still move past after this
* test, but as we are holding a reference to
* 'sh', we know that if that happens,
* STRIPE_EXPANDING will get set and the expansion
* won't proceed until we finish with the stripe.
*/
int must_retry = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
if (!ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
conf->reshape_progress))
/* mismatch, need to try again */
must_retry = 1;
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
if (must_retry) {
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
schedule();
do_prepare = true;
goto retry;
}
if (do_flush) {
set_bit(STRIPE_R5C_PREFLUSH, &sh->state);
/* we only need flush for one stripe */
do_flush = false;
}
}
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
if ((!sh->batch_head || sh == sh->batch_head) &&
(bi->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC) &&
!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
atomic_inc(&conf->preread_active_stripes);
release_stripe_plug(mddev, sh);
} else {
/* cannot get stripe for read-ahead, just give-up */
bi->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
break;
if (read_seqcount_retry(&conf->gen_lock, seq)) {
/* Might have got the wrong stripe_head by accident */
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
goto retry;
}
if (test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state) ||
!add_stripe_bio(sh, bi, dd_idx, rw, previous)) {
/*
* Stripe is busy expanding or add failed due to
* overlap. Flush everything and wait a while.
*/
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
schedule();
do_prepare = true;
goto retry;
}
if (do_flush) {
set_bit(STRIPE_R5C_PREFLUSH, &sh->state);
/* we only need flush for one stripe */
do_flush = false;
}
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
if ((!sh->batch_head || sh == sh->batch_head) &&
(bi->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC) &&
!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
atomic_inc(&conf->preread_active_stripes);
release_stripe_plug(mddev, sh);
}
finish_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment