Commit 2e036804 authored by Alexandru Ardelean's avatar Alexandru Ardelean Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio: buffer: remove 'scan_el_attrs' attribute group from buffer struct

This field doesn't seem used. It seems that only 'buffer->attrs' was ever
used to extend sysfs attributes for an IIO buffer.

Moving forward, it may not make sense to keep it. This patch removes the
field and it's initialization code.

Since we want to rework IIO buffer, to be able to add more buffers per IIO
device, we will merge [somehow] the 'buffer' & 'scan_elements' groups, and
we will continue to add the attributes to the 'buffer' group.

Removing it here, will also make the rework here a bit smaller, since
this code will not be present.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
parent 97f1755e
......@@ -1283,11 +1283,6 @@ int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
indio_dev->groups[indio_dev->groupcounter++] = &buffer->buffer_group;
if (buffer->scan_el_attrs != NULL) {
attr = buffer->scan_el_attrs->attrs;
while (*attr++ != NULL)
attrcount_orig++;
}
attrcount = attrcount_orig;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
channels = indio_dev->channels;
......@@ -1325,9 +1320,6 @@ int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto error_free_scan_mask;
}
if (buffer->scan_el_attrs)
memcpy(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs, buffer->scan_el_attrs,
sizeof(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs[0])*attrcount_orig);
attrn = attrcount_orig;
list_for_each_entry(p, &buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list, l)
......
......@@ -94,12 +94,6 @@ struct iio_buffer {
unsigned int watermark;
/* private: */
/*
* @scan_el_attrs: Control of scan elements if that scan mode
* control method is used.
*/
struct attribute_group *scan_el_attrs;
/* @scan_timestamp: Does the scan mode include a timestamp. */
bool scan_timestamp;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment