tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef
tick_nohz_full_mask lists the CPUs that are nohz_full. This is only needed when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined. tick_nohz_full_cpu() allows a specific CPU to be tested against the mask, and evaluates to false when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not defined. The resctrl code needs to pick a CPU to run some work on, a new helper prefers housekeeping CPUs by examining the tick_nohz_full_mask. Hiding the declaration behind #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL forces all the users to be behind an #ifdef too. Move the tick_nohz_full_mask declaration, this lets callers drop the #ifdef, and guard access to tick_nohz_full_mask with IS_ENABLED() or something like tick_nohz_full_cpu(). The definition does not need to be moved as any callers should be removed at compile time unless CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> # for resctrl dependency Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> # arm64 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213184438.16675-2-james.morse@arm.comSigned-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment