Commit 34968106 authored by AMAN DEEP's avatar AMAN DEEP Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

usb: xhci: Bugfix for NULL pointer deference in xhci_endpoint_init() function

virt_dev->num_cached_rings counts on freed ring and is not updated
correctly. In xhci_free_or_cache_endpoint_ring() function, the free ring
is added into cache and then num_rings_cache is incremented as below:
		virt_dev->ring_cache[rings_cached] =
			virt_dev->eps[ep_index].ring;
		virt_dev->num_rings_cached++;
here, free ring pointer is added to a current index and then
index is incremented.
So current index always points to empty location in the ring cache.
For getting available free ring, current index should be decremented
first and then corresponding ring buffer value should be taken from ring
cache.

But In function xhci_endpoint_init(), the num_rings_cached index is
accessed before decrement.
		virt_dev->eps[ep_index].new_ring =
			virt_dev->ring_cache[virt_dev->num_rings_cached];
		virt_dev->ring_cache[virt_dev->num_rings_cached] = NULL;
		virt_dev->num_rings_cached--;
This is bug in manipulating the index of ring cache.
And it should be as below:
		virt_dev->num_rings_cached--;
		virt_dev->eps[ep_index].new_ring =
			virt_dev->ring_cache[virt_dev->num_rings_cached];
		virt_dev->ring_cache[virt_dev->num_rings_cached] = NULL;

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAman Deep <aman.deep@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent abce329c
......@@ -1427,10 +1427,10 @@ int xhci_endpoint_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
/* Attempt to use the ring cache */
if (virt_dev->num_rings_cached == 0)
return -ENOMEM;
virt_dev->num_rings_cached--;
virt_dev->eps[ep_index].new_ring =
virt_dev->ring_cache[virt_dev->num_rings_cached];
virt_dev->ring_cache[virt_dev->num_rings_cached] = NULL;
virt_dev->num_rings_cached--;
xhci_reinit_cached_ring(xhci, virt_dev->eps[ep_index].new_ring,
1, type);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment