Commit 35885a69 authored by Paul Burton's avatar Paul Burton Committed by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

MIPS: math-emu: Fix BC1{EQ,NE}Z emulation

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878232

commit 93583e17 upstream.

The conditions for branching when emulating the BC1EQZ & BC1NEZ
instructions were backwards, leading to each of those instructions being
treated as the other. Fix this by reversing the conditions, and clear up
the code a little for readability & checkpatch.

Fixes: c909ca71 ("MIPS: math-emu: Emulate missing BC1{EQ,NE}Z instructions")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJames Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13150/Signed-off-by: default avatarRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIan May <ian.may@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
parent 2b0674a3
......@@ -975,9 +975,10 @@ static int cop1Emulate(struct pt_regs *xcp, struct mips_fpu_struct *ctx,
struct mm_decoded_insn dec_insn, void *__user *fault_addr)
{
unsigned long contpc = xcp->cp0_epc + dec_insn.pc_inc;
unsigned int cond, cbit;
unsigned int cond, cbit, bit0;
mips_instruction ir;
int likely, pc_inc;
union fpureg *fpr;
u32 __user *wva;
u64 __user *dva;
u32 wval;
......@@ -1189,14 +1190,14 @@ static int cop1Emulate(struct pt_regs *xcp, struct mips_fpu_struct *ctx,
return SIGILL;
cond = likely = 0;
fpr = &current->thread.fpu.fpr[MIPSInst_RT(ir)];
bit0 = get_fpr32(fpr, 0) & 0x1;
switch (MIPSInst_RS(ir)) {
case bc1eqz_op:
if (get_fpr32(&current->thread.fpu.fpr[MIPSInst_RT(ir)], 0) & 0x1)
cond = 1;
cond = bit0 == 0;
break;
case bc1nez_op:
if (!(get_fpr32(&current->thread.fpu.fpr[MIPSInst_RT(ir)], 0) & 0x1))
cond = 1;
cond = bit0 != 0;
break;
}
goto branch_common;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment