Commit 3686637e authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski Committed by David S. Miller

net/tls: fix state removal with feature flags off

TLS offload drivers shouldn't (and currently don't) block
the TLS offload feature changes based on whether there are
active offloaded connections or not.

This seems to be a good idea, because we want the admin to
be able to disable the TLS offload at any time, and there
is no clean way of disabling it for active connections
(TX side is quite problematic).  So if features are cleared
existing connections will stay offloaded until they close,
and new connections will not attempt offload to a given
device.

However, the offload state removal handling is currently
broken if feature flags get cleared while there are
active TLS offloads.

RX side will completely bail from cleanup, even on normal
remove path, leaving device state dangling, potentially
causing issues when the 5-tuple is reused.  It will also
fail to release the netdev reference.

Remove the RX-side warning message, in next release cycle
it should be printed when features are disabled, rather
than when connection dies, but for that we need a more
efficient method of finding connection of a given netdev
(a'la BPF offload code).

Fixes: 4799ac81 ("tls: Add rx inline crypto offload")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 38030d7c
...@@ -939,12 +939,6 @@ void tls_device_offload_cleanup_rx(struct sock *sk) ...@@ -939,12 +939,6 @@ void tls_device_offload_cleanup_rx(struct sock *sk)
if (!netdev) if (!netdev)
goto out; goto out;
if (!(netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RX)) {
pr_err_ratelimited("%s: device is missing NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RX cap\n",
__func__);
goto out;
}
netdev->tlsdev_ops->tls_dev_del(netdev, tls_ctx, netdev->tlsdev_ops->tls_dev_del(netdev, tls_ctx,
TLS_OFFLOAD_CTX_DIR_RX); TLS_OFFLOAD_CTX_DIR_RX);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment