sched, net: Fixup busy_loop_us_clock()
The only valid use of preempt_enable_no_resched() is if the very next line is schedule() or if we know preemption cannot actually be enabled by that statement due to known more preempt_count 'refs'. This busy_poll stuff looks to be completely and utterly broken, sched_clock() can return utter garbage with interrupts enabled (rare but still) and it can drift unbounded between CPUs. This means that if you get preempted/migrated and your new CPU is years behind on the previous CPU we get to busy spin for a _very_ long time. There is a _REASON_ sched_clock() warns about preemptability - papering over it with a preempt_disable()/preempt_enable_no_resched() is just terminal brain damage on so many levels. Replace sched_clock() usage with local_clock() which has a bounded drift between CPUs (<2 jiffies). There is a further problem with the entire busy wait poll thing in that the spin time is additive to the syscall timeout, not inclusive. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com Cc: jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de> Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: lenb@kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131119151338.GF3694@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment