Commit 37f8d2f4 authored by Michael Buesch's avatar Michael Buesch Committed by Chris Wright

[PATCH] bcm43xx: fix watchdog timeouts.

This fixes a netdev watchdog timeout problem.
The problem is caused by a needed netif_tx_disable
in the hardware calibration code and can be shown by the
following timegraph.

|---5secs - ~10 jiffies time---|---|OOPS
^                              ^
last real TX                   periodic work stops netif

At OOPS, the following happens:
The watchdog timer triggers, because the timeout of 5secs
is over. The watchdog first checks for stopped TX.
_Usually_ TX is only stopped from the TX handler to indicate
a full TX queue. But this is different. We need to stop TX here,
regardless of the TX queue state. So the watchdog recognizes
the stopped device and assumes it is stopped due to full
TX queues (Which is a _wrong_ assumption in this case). It then
tests how far the last TX has been in the past. If it's more than
5secs (which is the case for low or no traffic), it will fire
a TX timeout.
Acked-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
parent 955ebc8d
......@@ -3165,7 +3165,15 @@ static void bcm43xx_periodic_work_handler(void *d)
badness = estimate_periodic_work_badness(bcm->periodic_state);
mutex_lock(&bcm->mutex);
/* We must fake a started transmission here, as we are going to
* disable TX. If we wouldn't fake a TX, it would be possible to
* trigger the netdev watchdog, if the last real TX is already
* some time on the past (slightly less than 5secs)
*/
bcm->net_dev->trans_start = jiffies;
netif_tx_disable(bcm->net_dev);
spin_lock_irqsave(&bcm->irq_lock, flags);
if (badness > BADNESS_LIMIT) {
/* Periodic work will take a long time, so we want it to
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment