Commit 38b17afb authored by Wolfram Sang's avatar Wolfram Sang

macintosh: therm_windtunnel: fix regression when instantiating devices

Removing attach_adapter from this driver caused a regression for at
least some machines. Those machines had the sensors described in their
DT, too, so they didn't need manual creation of the sensor devices. The
old code worked, though, because manual creation came first. Creation of
DT devices then failed later and caused error logs, but the sensors
worked nonetheless because of the manually created devices.

When removing attach_adaper, manual creation now comes later and loses
the race. The sensor devices were already registered via DT, yet with
another binding, so the driver could not be bound to it.

This fix refactors the code to remove the race and only manually creates
devices if there are no DT nodes present. Also, the DT binding is updated
to match both, the DT and manually created devices. Because we don't
know which device creation will be used at runtime, the code to start
the kthread is moved to do_probe() which will be called by both methods.

Fixes: 3e7bed52 ("macintosh: therm_windtunnel: drop using attach_adapter")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201723Reported-by: default avatarErhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Tested-by: default avatarErhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Signed-off-by: default avatarWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # v4.19+
parent 54498e80
......@@ -300,9 +300,11 @@ static int control_loop(void *dummy)
/* i2c probing and setup */
/************************************************************************/
static int
do_attach( struct i2c_adapter *adapter )
static void do_attach(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
{
struct i2c_board_info info = { };
struct device_node *np;
/* scan 0x48-0x4f (DS1775) and 0x2c-2x2f (ADM1030) */
static const unsigned short scan_ds1775[] = {
0x48, 0x49, 0x4a, 0x4b, 0x4c, 0x4d, 0x4e, 0x4f,
......@@ -313,25 +315,24 @@ do_attach( struct i2c_adapter *adapter )
I2C_CLIENT_END
};
if( strncmp(adapter->name, "uni-n", 5) )
return 0;
if( !x.running ) {
struct i2c_board_info info;
if (x.running || strncmp(adapter->name, "uni-n", 5))
return;
memset(&info, 0, sizeof(struct i2c_board_info));
strlcpy(info.type, "therm_ds1775", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
np = of_find_compatible_node(adapter->dev.of_node, NULL, "MAC,ds1775");
if (np) {
of_node_put(np);
} else {
strlcpy(info.type, "MAC,ds1775", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, &info, scan_ds1775, NULL);
}
strlcpy(info.type, "therm_adm1030", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
np = of_find_compatible_node(adapter->dev.of_node, NULL, "MAC,adm1030");
if (np) {
of_node_put(np);
} else {
strlcpy(info.type, "MAC,adm1030", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, &info, scan_adm1030, NULL);
if( x.thermostat && x.fan ) {
x.running = 1;
x.poll_task = kthread_run(control_loop, NULL, "g4fand");
}
}
return 0;
}
static int
......@@ -404,8 +405,8 @@ attach_thermostat( struct i2c_client *cl )
enum chip { ds1775, adm1030 };
static const struct i2c_device_id therm_windtunnel_id[] = {
{ "therm_ds1775", ds1775 },
{ "therm_adm1030", adm1030 },
{ "MAC,ds1775", ds1775 },
{ "MAC,adm1030", adm1030 },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, therm_windtunnel_id);
......@@ -414,6 +415,7 @@ static int
do_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
{
struct i2c_adapter *adapter = cl->adapter;
int ret = 0;
if( !i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA
| I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE) )
......@@ -421,11 +423,19 @@ do_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
switch (id->driver_data) {
case adm1030:
return attach_fan( cl );
ret = attach_fan(cl);
break;
case ds1775:
return attach_thermostat(cl);
ret = attach_thermostat(cl);
break;
}
return 0;
if (!x.running && x.thermostat && x.fan) {
x.running = 1;
x.poll_task = kthread_run(control_loop, NULL, "g4fand");
}
return ret;
}
static struct i2c_driver g4fan_driver = {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment