Commit 38d0e83b authored by Krzysztof Kozlowski's avatar Krzysztof Kozlowski Committed by Arnd Bergmann

Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: document dtbs_check requirement for Samsung

Samsung ARM/ARM64 SoCs (except legacy S5PV210) are also expected not to
bring any new dtbs_check warnings.  In fact this have been already
enforced and tested since few release.

Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712084131.127982-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
parent c25223cb
...@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ with the dt-bindings that describe the ABI. Please read the section ...@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ with the dt-bindings that describe the ABI. Please read the section
more information on the validation of devicetrees. more information on the validation of devicetrees.
For new platforms, or additions to existing ones, ``make dtbs_check`` should not For new platforms, or additions to existing ones, ``make dtbs_check`` should not
add any new warnings. For RISC-V, as it has the advantage of being a newer add any new warnings. For RISC-V and Samsung SoC, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is
architecture, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is required to not add any new warnings. required to not add any new warnings.
If in any doubt about a devicetree change, reach out to the devicetree If in any doubt about a devicetree change, reach out to the devicetree
maintainers. maintainers.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment