Commit 392be0bd authored by Robert Richter's avatar Robert Richter Committed by Dan Williams

cxl/mem: Force array size of mem_commands[] to CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX

Typically the mem_commands[] array is in sync with 'enum { CXL_CMDS }'.
Current code works well.

However, the array size of mem_commands[] may not strictly be the same
as CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX. E.g. if a new CXL_CMD() is added that is
guarded by #ifdefs, the array could be shorter. This could lead then
further to an out-of-bounds array access in cxl_validate_cmd_from_user().

Fix this by forcing the array size to CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX. This
also adds range checks for array items in mem_commands[] at compile
time.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210324141635.22335-1-rrichter@amd.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
parent 7eda6457
......@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ struct cxl_mem_command {
* table will be validated against the user's input. For example, if size_in is
* 0, and the user passed in 1, it is an error.
*/
static struct cxl_mem_command mem_commands[] = {
static struct cxl_mem_command mem_commands[CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX] = {
CXL_CMD(IDENTIFY, 0, 0x43, CXL_CMD_FLAG_FORCE_ENABLE),
#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_MEM_RAW_COMMANDS
CXL_CMD(RAW, ~0, ~0, 0),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment