Commit 39b3f6d6 authored by Eric Sandeen's avatar Eric Sandeen Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] mount udf UDF_PART_FLAG_READ_ONLY partitions with MS_RDONLY

There's a bug where a UDF_PART_FLAG_READ_ONLY udf partition gets mounted
read-write, then subsequent problems happen; files seem to be able to be
removed, but file creation results in EIO or worse, oops.

EIO is coming from udf_new_block(), which returns EIO if the right flags
aren't set; only UDF_PART_FLAG_READ_ONLY is set in this case.  We probably
s hould not have gotten this far...

Attached patch seems to fix it - and includes a printk to alert the user
that their "rw" mount request has been converted to "ro."

Here's the testcase I used:

[root@magnesium ~]# mkisofs -R -J -udf -o testiso /tmp/
...
Total translation table size: 0
Total rockridge attributes bytes: 342923
Total directory bytes: 382312
Path table size(bytes): 104
Max brk space used 103000
105059 extents written (205 MB)

[root@magnesium ~]# mount -o loop testiso /mnt/test/
[root@magnesium ~]# ls /mnt/test/fsfile
/mnt/test/fsfile
[root@magnesium ~]# rm /mnt/test/fsfile
[root@magnesium ~]# ls /mnt/test/fsfile
ls: /mnt/test/fsfile: No such file or directory
[root@magnesium ~]# touch /mnt/test/fsfile
touch: cannot touch `/mnt/test/fsfile': Input/output error
[root@magnesium tmp]# grep udf /proc/mounts
/dev/loop1 /mnt/test udf rw 0 0

Force readonly mounts of UDF partitions marked as read-only.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 6c5c9341
......@@ -1621,6 +1621,10 @@ static int udf_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *options, int silent)
goto error_out;
}
if (UDF_SB_PARTFLAGS(sb, UDF_SB_PARTITION(sb)) & UDF_PART_FLAG_READ_ONLY)
printk("UDF-fs: Partition marked readonly; forcing readonly mount\n");
sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
if ( udf_find_fileset(sb, &fileset, &rootdir) )
{
printk("UDF-fs: No fileset found\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment